🤖ReplacedByAI
✨ Powered by GPT-4o

Told Your Probation Is Being Extended? What to Do First

The role is at risk, the hours change, the office reopens, the team moves, there are new terms to sign — every other page here answers a decision that has been made. This is the only one that answers a decision your employer declinedto make. They haven’t said no. They haven’t said yes. They bought time, and you’re the only party whose position changed while nothing happened. So this won’t tell you an extension means you’re on your way out or that it’s a paper trail — and it won’t tell you it’s routine, administrative or a formality either, which is the commoner reading and the more expensive one, because a reader who is reassured does nothing for three months. The bar usually doesn’t exist: an extension with a new date and no stated standard ends exactly the way the first period ended, because the same person makes the same judgement on the same day with nothing to point at. So the first work is getting four things in writing in the first days rather than the last — what specifically has to be different, who decides, what they’ll actually look at, and the date — and it won’t invent that bar for you, not a target, a metric, a number or a piece of work nobody named, because a standard this page chose is one you’d then be judged against on your own suggestion. And both instinctive responses cost you the job: going quiet reads as the doubt confirming itself, and overcorrecting with hours and visible effort reads as somebody who knows they’re in trouble and makes every ordinary week afterwards look like a relapse. You get what the extension is and isn’t, the four things to get in writing, who actually decides, the message at no more than 112 words, what to change and what to leave exactly as it is, the three replies that come back, and four questions this page won’t answer — each with the person, function or document that holds it.

Sample probation extension plan

Generated for: Implementation consultant, told in a twenty-minute meeting on the Friday, nothing in writing since, new date three months out, the manager who hired them left in month two, two weeks off in the middle after an operation, and nobody has said what would count as “more confidence”

What this is, and what it isn’t — They haven’t said no. They haven’t said yes. They bought time. What is known is the date; what isn’t is the bar.

The real one is built on what you were actually told, where you are with it, and what you want this to achieve. The opening of yours is free — no card, no account. One credit finishes it. See what a credit costs.

First one is free — no card needed.

Credits

— credits available

Note the question: it asks what was said, in their words — not what you think it meant. That is deliberate, and it is the whole hinge of the page. The note this builds can only answer a stated reason, and a reader who answers the reason they suspectstarts a different conversation with somebody who never raised it. If nothing was said, leave it empty — that comes back as a bracketed placeholder telling you what to go and ask, never as a reason this page supplied. A reason nobody gave is one you’d then be defending to whoever asked where it came from.

Whether a probation decision here runs through a written process with a form and a second signature on it, or is one manager’s call made in a meeting, is completely different at a 40-person firm and somewhere with a people team and an HR system — and that difference decides who you write to and what you ask them for. So a sentence about the place is worth giving, but it comes back as context for the routing, never as a description of what that employer’s process requires, what it usually does, or what happens at the end of one. No real name is needed and none goes into the draft.

These aren’t the same conversation, and which one you’re in decides what this week is actually for. No reason was givenis an unfinished conversation rather than a verdict with the reason withheld — there is nothing yet for you to answer, and the question that closes it works best asked plainly and early. Nothing measurableis the branch where people set about becoming a different person: an unmeasurable criterion isn’t a bar, it’s a judgement somebody makes on a date of their choosing. Just a formality is the one where doing nothing costs the most, because a formality with no bar attached ends in exactly the same meeting as a serious one. And one specific incidentis the most winnable and the easiest to lose, because it’s the only version with a fact in it and the instinctive answer is a rebuttal. Nothing here tells you the outcome is likely — and nothing tells you it isn’t.

This decides which section gets written. Find out what has to be differentis the real work and the part nearly everybody skips, because it feels like preparation — and it’s the only one of the four that discloses nothing and commits you to nothing: the person who forms the view, the person who signs the decision and the person who owns any written process are frequently three different people, and the first of them isn’t always your own manager. Get the bar in writingis the shape the page is built around, and it is four things and nothing else — what has to be different, who decides, what they’ll look at, and the date. Correct something that was saidis the one most likely to cost you the job when it’s done the way people do it, so it’s coached as one checkable fact rather than a response to all of it — a judgement answered with an argument becomes a documented disagreement while the decision is still open. Get a datelooks like the anxious question and isn’t: the part that matters is whether anything happens between now and it.

What is useful here is the history of the conversation, not a defence of your work: what was said and when, who said it, whether any of it was written down, what the new date is, and what has happened since. That is what decides where this goes next — a conversation nobody recorded arrives at the new date as somebody else’s memory of what was agreed, and a question asked in the last fortnight reads as somebody building a record rather than somebody working on the right thing. You do not need to put a diagnosis, a condition or a medical history in here; where time was missed, a factual line is all that comes back out. Nothing here rules on what happens next— not whether you’re likely to be confirmed, not how long a probation may run or whether it can be extended again, not what happens at the end of one, not whether anything can be appealed, not what notice applies inside the window, and not whether asking will be held against you. Those go to whoever owns that process, to a representative where one exists, and to somebody qualified where you live. We never invent the bar — no target, no metric, no number, no piece of work nobody named — so anything you don’t supply comes back as a bracketed placeholder telling you what to go and ask. And nothing here writes a rebuttal, a grievance, an appeal or a threat to leave: reaching for one while a decision about you is still open converts something somebody could still settle into a matter that has to be handled.

Powered by GPT-4o • Takes ~15 seconds